Skip to main content

Cities Have Personalities - Parashat Lech Lecha 5779 - October 19, 2018

Image
By

Cities are places defined not only by geography – cities have personalities and identities that are tied to the peoples and cultures that reside within them. For example, the city of Memphis has geographical nuances – it is a city on a bluff bordered on three sides by rich agricultural land and on the fourth side by North America’s greatest river. Memphis, like other cities and lands, has a personality that transcends its geography; a personality shaped by the economic and sociological history of its residents.

In this week’s parasha, Lech Lecha, the Torah introduces us to our patriarchs, Avram and Sarai. The Torah tells us that Hashem commanded Avram to leave his land, his birthplace and the land of his fathers – to leave Ur Kasdim – and to go to the land that Hashem would show him. It was in this new land that Hashem would make Avram into a great nation and where he would be blessed. Apparently, Ur Kasdim was not a fitting place for Avram to become the father of a new nation that was devoted to Hashem. Ur Kasdim did not have the appropriate personality for Avram’s growth.

The Torah shares with us Avram and Sarai’s early encounters in Eretz Canaan. One of Avram’s early encounters with his meeting with Malki-Tzedek, king of Shalem and priest of Hashem. Malki-Tzedek means “king of justice” and Shalem is a variant of the word Shalom, “peace”. In this encounter, Avram takes a tenth of his possessions and gives them as a gift to Malki-Tzedek – presumably to assist him in his work as a priest of Hashem. The Midrash and mefarshim teach us that Malki-Tzedek is none other than Noach’s righteous son, Shem, and that Shalem was the future location of the great city of Yerushalayim. Why does the Torah refer to Shem by his pseudonym, Shem, and what message is conveyed by the name of Malki-Tzedek’s city – Shalem?

The Land of Canaan was a place designated by Hashem to convey values and enduring truths. By using these special names, Malki-Tzedek and Shalem, the Torah teaches us that Jerusalem was a city with a personality and identity from its very inception. Jerusalem was established as a center of justice and peace for all of humanity. When Avram donated ten percent of his assets to Malki-Tzedek, he was declaring that his work in ensuring justice and peace in the world was a vitally important endeavor. 

The prophet Isaiah teaches, ki mitzion tetze Torah – Torah comes from Zion. Isaiah is declaring that Zion-Israel is more than just the location where many of our greatest books and scholars come from. Zion is a beacon of Torah – its existence declares the importance of Torah and supports the promulgation of Torah. Similarly, Jerusalem proclaims an idea to the world declares that justice and peace are fundamental human values. As a city universally associated with Hashem, Yerushalayim declares to the world that societies must be built on justice and peace.

Hashem has blessed our generation with the ability to witness the growth and development of the State of Israel and its capital, Jerusalem. May we use this blessing to incorporate the values of Torah, peace and justice into our own lives and to influence the city in which we live.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

By
This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe
Post a Comment
Read more

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

By
This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P
Post a Comment
Read more

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

By
Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor
Post a Comment
Read more