Skip to main content

A Community of Individuals - Parashat Noach 5779 - October 11, 2018


This week’s parasha, Parashat Noach, describes the dor haflaga – the generation of the division – the story of the Tower of Bavel.

The Torah explains that approximately four hundred years after the flood, all of the families of the earth began to settle in one locale. These families shared a common language, culture and outlook and decided to become more industrially advanced.

The Torah writes, “They said one to another, ‘Come, let us make bricks and burn them in fire.’ And the brick served them as stone, and the bitumen served them as mortar. And they said, ‘Come let us build us a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed across the whole earth.’”

The Torah then tells us that Hashem, seeing that they had one culture and had decided to construct this tower, confuses their language – causing them to become spread across the whole earth. Hashem said, “Behold, they are one people with one language for all, and this they begin to do!”

From the way in which Hashem intervened, it seems that that the generation of the Tower of Bavel committed a sin. However, when reading this section in the Torah, it is not clear what they did wrong. On the contrary, by creating industry and building a strong city with a tower, the generation seems to have acted quite rationally. They appear to have been coping with the natural world.

Furthermore, the Torah implies that part of their sin was that they had one shared outlook – one community.  Why is this a sinful attribute? Indeed, the Torah supports the idea of shared perspective at the expense of individuality. The Torah commands us, lo titgodedu – a community may not divide into agudot - sub-communities. Specifically, a community should not have two courts – this one deciding halacha one way for the community and another one deciding halacha differently for the same community. It is difficult to understand what this generation did improperly.

Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch suggests an approach to answering these questions. When reading this passage, we are struck by the fact that the Torah says that Hashem “descended” to see the city and the tower that the people had built. Hashem knows all – he has no need to “descend”!

“Descending” indicates that Hashem was “looking” more closely – He was judging motives. “Descending” indicates that there was nothing inherently wrong with industrialization and cities and towers. The sin of this generation lay in their intentions. 

What motivated this generation?

The generation pronounced their intention – na’aseh lanu shem – let us make a name for our community.
The generation of the Tower of Bavel created and strengthened their community for an arrogant purpose. Building the tower was an exercise in communal self-aggrandizement. In fact, the Torah reveals their motive when it tells us that they said pen nafutz al peneh kol ha’aretz – lest we become dispersed over the entire earth.
A community that is concerned with the welfare of its individuals would say, “Lest we become weak and hurt the potential of our members to become more perfected.”  Instead, they were afraid of not being a community – they prioritized the welfare of the community over and above all else.

Through the mitzva of lo titgodedu, the Torah teaches that a healthy community is very important – we are not permitted to not allow the community to devolve into warring sub-groups. However, the story of the generation of the Tower of Bavel teaches us that, in its essence, a community is a vehicle to strengthen each of its individual members. A healthy community bolsters each person’s relationship with the Almighty and each one’s pursuit of justice and morality. A healthy community centers itself around a guiding principle – a mission statement towards a worthy purpose – or it is better off not existing. 
Each community struggles with the tension of balancing the needs of the group and the needs of its members. The tension is inherent. Community is critical and must be supported and not undermined. Simultaneously, every individual is important and the purpose of a community is to support individual growth and perfection. The Torah teaches that the challenge for a community is to maintain a healthy outlook – one that supports the growth of each of its members.

I am proud that our MHA-FYOS school community, in specific, and our Memphis Jewish Community, in general, is oriented towards supporting the development and growth of each of its individuals within the context of a healthy community. May Hashem bless our community with strength and vibrancy towards this worthy aim.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor