Skip to main content

Teaching Empathy - Parashat Ki Tetze - September 1, 2017

This week’s parasha, Ki Tetze, presents a summary of many of the mitzvot.

In the last section of the parasha, the Torah recounts two sets of commandments.

The first set discusses the just treatment of the downtrodden. The Torah writes, “You shall not pervert the judgment of a convert or orphan and you shall not take the garment of a widow as a pledge. You will remember that you were a slave in Egypt and Hashem, your G-d, redeemed you from there; therefore, I command you to do this thing.”

The second set discusses the obligations of a harvester to the downtrodden. The Torah writes, “When you reap your harvest in your field, and you forget a bundle in the field, you shall not turn back to take it; it will be for the convert, the orphan and the widow, so that Hashem, your G-d, will bless you in all that you do. When you beat the olive tree, do not remove all the splendor behind you; it will be for the convert, the orphan and the widow. When you harvest your vineyard, you will not glean behind you; it will be for the convert, the orphan and the widow. You will remember that you were a slave in Egypt, therefore I command you to do this thing.”

In these two sets of verses, the Torah connects the treatment of the downtrodden to the Jewish People’s experience in Egypt. However, upon closer examination, the connection being made in each set of mitzvot is different.

Regarding the first set, the just treatment of the downtrodden, the Torah focuses on one aspect of the experience in Egypt – that Hashem redeemed us. Commenting on this focus, Seforno explains that Hashem took note of the Jewish People’s desperate situation and dealt with us over and beyond the requirements of justice in order to be able to redeem us. In other words, we should emulate Hashem. Just as Hashem responded to our people’s plight by treating us with mercy, beyond the strictures of justice, we must treat the downtrodden with mercy, beyond what strict justice demands. There is a specific law to not pervert justice to the less fortunate. We may not make life more difficult for the downtrodden by taking a needed garment as a pledge for a loan.

Regarding the second set of commandments, the obligations of a harvester to the less fortunate, the Torah focuses on the fact that we suffered in Egypt. Commenting on this focus, Seforno explains that in Egypt, our people were in need of even unripe grapes. In this comment, Seforno is highlighting that the Jewish People were desperate in Egypt and were in need of any type of support. Similarly, we must treat the downtrodden with support when we are collecting our harvest and earning a living.

In summary, the message of these two sets of mitzvot are identical – be sensitive to the plight of the needy. However, in teaching these sets of commandments, the Torah emphasizes two different aspects of our experience in Egypt – our nation’s suffering and Hashem’s merciful redemption of the Jewish People.

Apparently, it is insufficient to create a loose connection between our history and the plight of the downtrodden – a stronger and more precise identification is necessary. By connecting these sets of mitzvot to our people’s experience with our suffering in Egypt, the Torah is employing a very important educational methodology – inspiring empathy. Empathy stems from the recognition of the experience of the other. By pinpointing aspects of our history that connect to the plight of those who are suffering, the Torah arouses in us the inspiration and empathy to help the one in need.

Teaching our children to be empathetic is an imperative. Empathy is highly correlated with sensitivity and compassion. In these passages, the Torah conveys an important technique in teaching empathy – help our children reflect on their own experiences and feelings and use them as a touch-point in determining how to best relate to others.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor