Skip to main content

Fulfilling Our Jewish Responsibility - Parashat Nitzavim 5765 - September 11, 2015

The MHA/FYOS was abuzz this week in preparation for Rosh HaShana! The Boys and Girls High Schools each held a day of learning dedicated to Rosh HaShana topics. Elementary students learned special tefilot, songs and lessons. The bulletin boards and classrooms were decorated. The Early Childhood students made Rosh HaShana cards for the older members of our community. The Kollel MiTzion had its inaugural program. Each element of the school did its part to prepare for Rosh HaShana.

On Thursday night, I had the honor of speaking at the Kollel MiTzion night of learning.  I presented the following idea which relates to this theme of each person doing his or her part.

This week’s parsha, Nitzavim, describes Moshe’s inducting b'nei Yisrael into a covenant with Hashem.  Moshe Rabbenu begins, “You, all, are standing (nitzavim) here today before the Lord your God.  Your heads, your tribes, your elders, and your officers, even all the men of Israel, your little ones, your wives, and thy stranger that is in the midst of thy camp, from the hewer of thy wood unto the drawer of thy water.”

In the course of developing a very interesting theory about the uniqueness of this covenant, Ohr HaChayyim asks two questions on the text of Moshe Rabbenu’s announcement.  First, when describing b'nei Yisrael standing in front of Hashem, why does Moshe use the word, nitzavim, as opposed to the more common word, omdim?  Second, why does Moshe enumerate each segment of the Jewish People – heads, tribes, elders, officers, etc.?

Ohr HaChayyim begins by defining the word nitzavim more precisely.  He explains that the word means standing in the sense of an appointment.  Americans have a similar usage for the word “stand”.  Americans say that groomsmen “stand” for the groom.  This use of “stand” implies an appointment or a responsibility.  Moshe uses “stand” in this same sense – he is conveying to b'nei Yisrael that their relationship to this covenant is not casual or even volitional – it is an appointment to a responsibility.  Building on this definition, Ohr HaChayyim explains that Moshe Rabbenu details each segment of the society in order to convey that each member of b'nei Yisrael is appointed to the responsibility of fulfilling the covenant at his or her station in life – wherever that may be.  If the person is a leader – he should fulfill the covenant by leading.  If he is an elder, he should fulfill the covenant as an elder of the society.  If the person is a water-drawer, he should fulfill the covenant in that manner.  Each person is responsible to fulfill the covenant with Hashem from the perspective of his or her role in society. 

Ohr HaChayyim is describing an orientation to the Torah and to mitzvot.  It is incumbent upon each of us to ask ourselves what our role is in the community and in K’lal Yisrael and to view the fulfillment of that role as an appointment to a task.  As we enter Rosh HaShana and Yom Kippur and the Ten Days of Repentance, may we successfully identify our role and renew our commitment to fulfilling our appointment.

Shana Tova u’Metuka – A Happy and Sweet New Year

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor