Skip to main content

Intelligence is a Foundation of Prophecy - Parashat Shemos 5780, January 17, 2020


This week, we read the first parasha of Sefer Shemot. The parasha describes the increasingly difficult circumstances that b’nei yisrael were suffering under the rule of Paroh in Egypt. The parasha also introduces us to Moshe and describes his development into the leader of the Jewish People.

In his first prophetic experience, Moshe is shown an angel of Hashem within a burning bush. Moshe saw that the bush was burning but not being consumed. Moshe then says, “I will now turn and I will see this great vision – why is the bush not burning?” The Torah conveys that Hashem saw that Moshe had turned to see (the vision) and He called to Moshe from the midst of the bush, “Moshe, Moshe” to which Moshe responded, “I am here.” After this exchange, Hashem reveals to Moshe the content of the prophecy – that Hashem would redeem the Jewish People from Egypt through the agency of Moshe.

Looking more carefully at the details of this – Moshe’s first prophetic experience – we notice a seemingly innocuous detail – Moshe asked why the bush was not burning.

A similar detail is recorded within the Haftarah that Sephardim read this week – the well-known first prophecies of the prophet Jeremiah. Hashem says to Jeremiah, “What do you see, Jeremiah? And I (Jeremiah) said, ‘I see a stick of almond wood’.” Hashem then proceeds to share with Jeremiah the meaning of the vision.

Each of these prophecies share a common detail – the revelation of the prophecy is preceded by an observation of a physical phenomenon by the prophet. By including this detail in the description of each of these prophecies, the Torah seems to be conveying that the prophet’s observation was essential. Why is this detail important?

In his Laws of The Fundamentals of the Torah, Maimonides explains that, among many qualities, a prophet must be intelligent. Perhaps this requirement explains the inclusion of the observations made initially by Moshe and Jeremiah. Like a scientist exploring the world around him or her, Moshe and Jeremiah (with some prodding from Hashem), made an initial observation about the physical world. When confronted by a new situation, the first instinct of the researcher is, “What do I see?” or “How does it work?” Once Moshe and Jeremiah showed themselves to have this approach to understanding the world, they were prepared for prophecy.

One of the primary jobs of an educator is to harness and direct the innate creativity of his or her students to intelligently approach Torah and the world around us. From Moshe and Jeremiah we learn that, towards this end, the first instinct that we should cultivate is the What? or How? question. We can promote this instinct by teaching our children to look carefully at the text of the Torah and report the observations that they learn – what happened in the first plague? We can model looking at the world around us and noticing phenomena and learning how they work – what is steam and how does evaporation work? While partially innate, intelligence can be developed and refined. Today, we do not have access to prophecy, however, G-d has given us the gift of intelligence. Moshe and Jeremiah teach us the building blocks of this gift.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor