Skip to main content

The Severity of Gossip - Parshat Tazria - Metzora 5778 - April 20, 2018

This week’s parashiyot, Tazria and Metzora, deal with tzara’at. Tzara’at is a disease that afflicts the skin, clothing or home of those who commit certain types of sins – most commonly the sin of lashon hara – gossip.  Although the disease of tzara’at resembles leprosy, it was a physical disease caused by a spiritual sickness – an external consequence of an internal corruption.

In fact, the word metzora, the name given to one who is smitten with tzara’at, is an allusion to the sin that causes it. Metzora is a contraction of the phrase motzi shem ra – bringing about a bad name for another through spreading gossip about him or spreading falsehood.

Our rabbis repeatedly teach about the severity of the sin of motzi shem ra. Midrash Rabba (VaYikra 16:6) teaches that Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi says that the word “Torah” is used five times in connection with the word “Metzora” to teach us that anyone who spreads gossip about another is transgressing all five books of the Torah. 

Commenting on this Midrash, Perush Maharzu cites a teaching that the severity of spreading gossip is discussed in each of the Five Books of Moses: the sin of the snake (Beresheit), Datan and Aviram gossiping to Paroh about Moshe (Shemot), Tzara’at and the prohibition of gossiping (VaYikra), the Spies, Miriam and Korach (Bemidbar), and remembering the sin of Miriam (Devarim).

Another hint points us to the severity of gossip: these sections of the Torah – Parshiyot Tazria and Metzora – constitute the very center of the Torah. The Torah is apparently conveying that the issues dealt with in these sections are at the heart of the Torah itself.

On the command to love one’s fellow which is taught in Parashat Kedoshim, Rabbi Akiva teaches, ve’ahavta le’reacha kamocha – love your fellow Jew as you love yourself – this is the great principle of the Torah. Apparently, loving one’s fellow and not undermining the relationship with one’s fellow are not “regular” mitzvot. On the contrary, these mitzvot are fundamental.

What makes lashon hara such a grievous sin? On what basis is a gossiper comparable to one who transgresses the entire Torah?

One aim of the Torah is to outline the foundations and mission of the Jewish Nation. Spreading gossip about another is severe because it is poisonous. Gossip destroys the social fabric which binds our people. If the Torah is a mission for the Jewish People, those behaviors, such as gossip, which undermine Jewish Peoplehood are transgressions of the entire Torah.

Another aim of the Torah is to outline the path for personal perfection towards a more refined relationship with Hashem. Loving one’s fellow and refraining from speaking ill about others requires humility, graciousness and compassion. This love requires a person to take the first step towards a relationship with Hashem – to move away from self-centeredness by looking outside of one’s own needs and behaving in accordance with the desires of the “other”. When one gives charity or works to take care of the needs of another, that person recognizes that there is “another” – and builds a relationship with the ultimate “other” – Hashem.

For many, refraining from speaking gossip is a life-long battle. When engaging in this battle or in helping others to engage in this battle, it may be helpful to consider the deleterious consequences of speaking gossip – tearing at the fabric of the unity of the Jewish People and taking a step towards selfishness and a step away from one’s relationship with Hashem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor