Skip to main content

Small Acts of Holiness - Parasht Shemini 5778 - April 13, 2018



 Yom HaShoah, Yom HaZikaron, Yom HaAtzmaut – the annual commemoration of the establishment of The State of Israel, and the constant sacrifice made to maintain its security, out of the darkness and ashes of the Holocaust.  

Within one week we are overwhelmed by the sadness over the loss of those millions who perished at the hand of the Nazis, yemach shemam vezichronam, awed by the heroism of the soldiers of the Israel Defense Force and emboldened by the celebration of the existence of the State. Last evening, we, as a community, memorialized the victims and vociferously declared, in word and in deed, that we are survivors. This coming week, we will recognize the dedication and sacrifice of our Israeli soldiers through education and a tzedakah campaign. Twenty-four hours later, we will celebrate Israel with a march at 2:30 pm from MHA, up White Station Road, down Laurie Lane, down Yates and into Baron Hirsch Congregation. 

These days of remembrance and celebration are fraught with emotion particularly because they commemorate events that are fresh in our national consciousness. What makes this week challenging – besides for the intensity of emotion – is the roller-coaster nature of the emotions. How can we successfully navigate this week without succumbing to schizophrenia?  

This question is underscored by the fact that the events that we are commemorating did not occur over a century or even a lifetime. They occurred in less than a decade. How can it be that the Jewish People rose, within three years, from the depths of the Holocaust to form their own sovereign state in our ancestral homeland?

I would like to consider this question from a lesson from the end of this week’s parasha.  
The Torah writes, “For I am Hashem your G-d – make yourselves holy and you will be holy, for I am holy …” 

Our chachamim address the obvious duplication of the language of the verse – make yourselves holy and you will be holy – in a comment in Masechet Yoma. Our Rabbis explain that if a person makes himself holy a little bit, they will make him very holy.

Our Rabbis have a number of approaches to explaining how this principle works.  
Some explain that G-d greatly rewards a person who makes himself holy – particularly through refraining from eating non-kosher food – with a great spiritual reward – even more reward than he or she would normally deserve.

Rabbi Baruch HaLeyve Epstein in his commentary on Chumash – Torah Temima – connects this statement to another widely known dictum of our Rabbis – one mitzvah drags along another mitzvah.  That there is truth in this principle is borne out by experience. I will often advise students who are looking to grow in Torah observance to pick one mitzvah to perform regularly. Often, the attention to this one mitzvah leads to growth in other mitzvot, as well.

But, how does one Mitzvah drag along another? What is doing the dragging? Why does this principle work?

I would like to propose an answer based on a comment made by the medieval scholar, Rabbenu Yonah of Gerona.  

Hashem created man with a specific feature that drives this mitzvah-dragging phenomenon. A mitzvah-performance resides at the union of intention and act. When a person makes an initial commitment of thought and energy into performing a mitzvah, this commitment initiates a routine that leads to further mitzvah performance. The same is true when a person commits a sin. A routine is built by one combination of intention and resulting act.  

Man is dynamic. When a person puts his or her energy into an effort – the person is changed – now, he or she has momentum in a certain direction. This momentum drags along a new mitzvah in the wake of the previous mitzvah. This feature – that we are creatures of momentum and not static beings – explains how a person can make himself holy just a little bit and result is that he or she is made very holy. With just one intent and act of holiness, a person puts him or herself on a path of holiness – all attributable to that original act of mitzvah.

How was it possible that the State of Israel was borne – so quickly – out of the horror of the Holocaust?  Surely, there are many answers.  

One explanation is that the Rabbinic dictum that a person who makes himself holy a little bit will be made very holy, also operates on a national level. When individual Jews make themselves holy – even in a small way – the entire nation is made greatly holy.  

Perhaps the cumulative small acts of holiness performed by countless upon countless Jews – acts such as ones that were recalled at last night’s program and acts of heroism performed by those who fight in support of Israel – created the momentum to build a homeland for the Jewish People.  
How do we successfully navigate this week of memorials? The lesson of this week is that even a small initiative of holiness or of mitzvah can have far-reaching consequences that could not have been imagined.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor