Skip to main content

Compassion in the Real World and the Virtual World - Parashat Mishpatim 5778, February 9, 2018

This week’s parasha, Parashat Mishpatim, contains many, many mitzvot – 53, according to the count of the Sefer HaChinuch. The topics covered by these mitzvot include the proper treatment of slaves, the judicial system, the holidays and the prohibition on idolatry.

One mitzvah taught in the parasha is the commandment to help unload an animal of burden. The Torah writes, “If you see the donkey of someone you hate crouching under its burden, would you refrain from helping him? – you will help repeatedly with him.” Although the message of the verse is clear – that you are obligated to help unload the burden of an animal – the Torah includes a seemingly extraneous fact — the donkey is owned by someone who you hate.

Our sages discuss (Masechet Pesachim 113b) how the Torah can endorse the hatred of one Jew to another. In fact, the Torah explicitly forbids such hatred when it writes, “Do not hate your brother in your heart”. How can these two verses by reconciled? Our Sages explain that such hatred of one Jew to another is only permitted in a case where one Jew saw another Jew committing a sin of licentiousness in private, warned him to desist and the Jew continued in his sinful behavior. Thus, hatred of one Jew for another is almost universally proscribed. Only in this one situation does the Torah authorize an individual Jew to hate his fellow. Even when the Torah allows one Jew to hate his fellow, this hatred only extends to the one Jew’s feeling of connection to the other Jew. This hatred does not extend to denying the hated Jew assistance when he is unloading his animal of burden.

The Sefer HaChinuch explains that this mitzvah – to help unload the burden of a fellow Jew’s animal – trains us to adopt the most praiseworthy trait of all – compassion. Because one of the aims of the mitzvah is to help inculcate compassion, the obligation extends to helping a fellow Jew who is experiencing physical pain and even to helping a fellow Jew who is experiencing the psychological and financial pain of losing an object. In all of these situations, we are commanded to treat our fellow Jew compassionately.

On Sunday evening, February 25th at 7 pm, Margolin Hebrew Academy-Feinstone Yeshiva of the South will host noted expert, Dr. Eli Shapiro, to deliver a presentation entitled, “Teaching Kids to Navigate Social Media in a Healthy, Respectful and Positive Way”. In this lecture and discussion, Dr. Shapiro will share the research and best practices that he and his team have developed through their network, The Digital Citizenship Project and through their work with Jewish Day Schools across North America.

The Torah presents the obligation to show compassion for one’s fellow Jew through the example of unloading his animal of burden. For our students and children, this example may seem foreign. In our generation, a much more common opportunity to show compassion to our fellow man is to be a positive presence on social media. Like the Torah’s example of helping to unload a beast of burden, being a good citizen on social media is an opportunity that is easy to neglect – especially for our children. As teachers and parents, it is incumbent upon us to not only show a good example to our children but to learn how to teach our children to be an excellent Digital Citizen. I hope that you will join us for Dr. Shapiro’s presentation on Sunday, February 25th at 7 pm in the MHA Gymnasium.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor