Skip to main content

On Learning Torah - Parashat Beshalach 5778, January 26, 2018

This week’s parasha, Parashat Beshalach, describes the final steps of the liberation of the Jewish People from Egypt.

In last week’s parasha, the Torah describes b’nei yisrael leaving Egypt. After destroying the Egyptian firstborns, Hashem guided b’nei yisrael out of Egypt – leaving Ra’amses on the way to Sukkot. The Torah then inexplicably leaves aside the exodus story and introduces a series of commandments – specifically, the mitzvot of Pesach, tefilin, and redeeming the first born. The Torah resumes the exodus story in the beginning of our parasha. Why does the Torah interrupt the exodus story with the presentation of specific mitzvot?

In resuming the exodus story, the Torah writes: vayasev Elokim et ha’am derecho yam suf; vachamushim alu b’nei yisrael me’eretz mitzrayim – And Hashem took the nation the long way, the way of the desert to the Reed Sea; and the children of Israel brought arms up from the land of Egypt. (Shemot 13:18)

The Midrash is puzzled by the Torah’s inclusion, at this time, of the fact that the children of Israel were armed; instead of earlier in the exodus story. The Midrash notes that the ideal place to record this fact would seem to be at the beginning of the story – when the Jews first left Ra’amses (Egypt) and traveled to Sukkot (Shemot 12:37). Why does the Torah mention b’nei yisrael’s weapons at this point in the story?

To answer this question, let us consider the Torah’s use of a peculiar word, vayasev – within this story. Rashi adopts the simple translation, “and He took them the long way,” coming from the word sibev – to go around. However, the Midrash offers an alternate translation and suggests that this word comes from the word yesev – to eat in a leisurely manner (the word used by our sages for eating at the Pesach seder, haseba, also comes from this root). Now, in Sukkot, b’nei yisrael ate in a leisurely manner.

Based on the understanding of the Midrash, b’nei yisrael had a complete change of mindset. When the Jewish People first left Egypt they had been fearful of the desert ahead of them and Paroh behind them. Now, in Sukkot, they were free of these insecurities. Whereas, b’nei yisrael had had no time to let their dough rise when they first left Egypt, now they had time for a relaxing meal. Whereas, when they first left Egypt, b’nei yisrael would have been too overwhelmed with fear to use weapons, now they were prepared for battle.

What caused this change in b’nei yisrael’s mindset? Perhaps, the shift in the mindset of b’nei yisrael came from their reaction to their experience on the road from Ra’amses to Sukkot. At Sukkot, Hashem revealed mitzvot to b’nei yisrael. At Sukkot, the Jewish People became secure in their relationship with Hashem and in their knowledge of the truth of His revelation. They became Jews with a mission and a purpose. They became a nation ready for battle.

The Jewish People experienced this transformation through learning these mitzvot. For our generation, as well, Torah learning enables us to forge a relationship with Hashem through developing an understanding of His ways and His creations. Through Torah learning, we refine our understanding of our purpose as Jews and we gain the tools to pursue our nation’s mission.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor