Skip to main content

The Power of Immersive Jewish Day School Learning - Parashat Vayeira 5779 - October 26, 2018

In this week’s parasha, Hashem tells Avraham Avinu of His plan to destroy Sedom and its four sister cities. The Torah describes these cities as places of decrepit morals populated by denizens with corrupt values.

The Torah recounts that Avraham asked Hashem to preserve the cities on account of the tzaddikim – the righteous people – who lived in the cities. Avra-ham asked Hashem whether or not He would de-stroy the cities if there were 50 righteous people. Hashem responds that He would not. Avraham then inquires whether Hashem would destroy the cities if there were 45 righteous people. Hashem responds that He would not. Avraham then inquires about 40, 30, 20 or even 10 righteous people. Hashem re-sponds that in any of these cases, He would not cause destruction.

Our chachamim address a number of issues related to this interaction between Avraham and Hashem. One question that they address is why Avraham chose to inquire about 50, 45, 40, 30, 20 then 10 righteous people.  What was Avraham’s logic?

Rashi comments on our passage that 50 righteous people were comprised of 10 righteous people in each of the five cities. Ramban interprets Rashi to mean that Avraham’s first request was to preserve each of the five cities only if there were 10 right-eous people per city. Avraham’s next inquiry con-cerned 45 righteous people – this request was to preserve each of the cities if there were 9 righteous people per city with the Almighty, Himself, being counted as the tenth. Avraham then inquired about  40, 30, 20 and 10. In these requests, Avraham inquired whether individual cities would be saved if they each contained 10 righteous people. He inquired as to whether Hashem would preserve 4, 3, 2 or even 1 of the cities on account of its 10 tzaddikim. Ramban’s interpretation suggests that 10 righteous individuals create a merit for a society. However, he does not explain what merit is created by 10 tzaddikim. 

The Torah calls ten people an eyda – a congregation. A minyan is comprised of 10 men. Halacha regards a public act as one done before 10 people. Ten people comprise a substantive group – a whole more than the sum of its parts. Apparently, the preservation of these wicked cities required the influence of a righteous group. The presence of a handful of righteous people does not suffice to help a city change its nature. For this reason, Hashem agreed to preserve each individual city on the condition that a righteous group was present to help the city turn away from evil.

The power of a Jewish Day School education is an excellent example of the strong influence that a righteous group has on the attitudes and values of its members. Studies consistently show that the one thing that will ensure Jewish continuity for our communities and for our children is intensive Jewish Day School Education.

Why does Jewish Day School Education work so well? A Jewish Day School Education is so powerful because students are immersed in the culture of Torah-study and love of mitzvot, Israel and the Jewish People through Jewish learning and through their continual exposure to their rebbeim, morot, teachers and fellow students. Because we are hard-wired to be affected by the culture in which we live, humans cannot escape the impact on our morals of peer pressure, group-think and other subtle group influences. Therefore, the To-rah teaches us to not only seek out righteous friends and neighbors. Through Avraham’s inquiry we learn about the critical importance of associating not only with righteous individuals but with righteous groups of people. When we associate with righteous groups, we are influenced on a different level and with a qualitatively different power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Honor and Glory - Parashat Termuah 5780, February 28, 2020

This week’s  parasha , Termuah, and next week’s parasha , Tetzave, introduce Hashem’s command regarding the plans for the  mishkan  and its vessels – including the clothing worn by the  kohanim . One of the vessels that Hashem commands to be built is the  menorah  – the candelabra. The description of the plans for the menorah are described in Parashat Terumah and the description of its service is described in Parashat Tetzave. In Parashat Tetzave, the Torah says, “and they will take for you pure olive oil pressed to be lit to raise an everlasting candle.” Each evening the  kohanim  were obligated to light the candelabra with enough oil to last the night. In the morning, the  kohanim  were obligated to fix and relight the  menorah , as necessary, thus ensuring that the candelabra would constantly be lit. The Rambam – Maimonides – explains, based on a later verse, that the  mitzvah  to light the candelabra in the mishkan creates “honor and glory” for the  mishkan . It seems obvious

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor