Skip to main content

Perhaps - Parashat Chaye Sarah 5779 - November 2, 2018

This message is dedicated to the memory of my friend, Leonid Saharavici, of blessed memory. May his soul be bound up in the bounds of eternal life. 

This week’s parasha, Parashat Chaye Sarah, describes the quest of Avraham’s servant to find a wife for Yitzchak. This servant, identified by our chachamim as Eliezer of Damascus, travelled to Aram Naharayim to advance this important goal.

Before leaving on his journey, Eliezer is given strict instructions by his master, Avraham. Avraham commands Eliezer, “…swear by Hashem, G-d of heaven and G-d of earth, that you not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell. Rather, to my land and to my kindred shall you go and take a wife from my son for Isaac.”

Eliezer, considering the worst-case scenario, asks, “Perhaps the woman shall not wish to follow me to this land; shall I take your son back to the land from which you departed?”

Avraham emphatically responds that, under such circumstances, Eliezer would be free of his oath and that he should not take Yitzchak to Aram Naharayim.

Our chachamim, who are very sensitive to the lan-guage used by the Torah, point out a nuance in Eliezer’s response to Avraham. Eliezer says,

“Perhaps – u’lai – the woman shall not wish to follow me”. Our sages point out that there are two synonyms in Hebrew for perhaps – u’lai and pen. U’lai conveys “perhaps” in the sense of opportunity and optimism. Pen conveys “perhaps” in the sense of concern and pessimism. U’lai is a “glass is half-full” word. Pen is a ”glass is half empty” word. Thus, without openly saying it, Eliezer was saying to Avraham that wished that the woman would not consent to return to Eretz Yisrael to marry Yitzchak. On this basis, our chachamim explain that Eliezer hoped that his own daughter would be able to marry Yitzchak, and that his line would be connected with that of Avraham.

This nuanced approach to studying Torah – being sensitive to the language that people use – is an im-portant lesson for educators and parents. We communicate constantly and the words that we choose impact the people who we talk to. There is an additional lesson. Listen carefully to those who com-municate with us. Words are a tool of communication. True communication is the meeting of the minds that comes through understanding. By listening carefully to the word choices of the people who talk to us, we gain a deeper understanding into the mindset of those who we want to under-stand. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Honor and Glory - Parashat Termuah 5780, February 28, 2020

This week’s  parasha , Termuah, and next week’s parasha , Tetzave, introduce Hashem’s command regarding the plans for the  mishkan  and its vessels – including the clothing worn by the  kohanim . One of the vessels that Hashem commands to be built is the  menorah  – the candelabra. The description of the plans for the menorah are described in Parashat Terumah and the description of its service is described in Parashat Tetzave. In Parashat Tetzave, the Torah says, “and they will take for you pure olive oil pressed to be lit to raise an everlasting candle.” Each evening the  kohanim  were obligated to light the candelabra with enough oil to last the night. In the morning, the  kohanim  were obligated to fix and relight the  menorah , as necessary, thus ensuring that the candelabra would constantly be lit. The Rambam – Maimonides – explains, based on a later verse, that the  mitzvah  to light the candelabra in the mishkan creates “honor and glory” for the  mishkan . It seems obvious

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor