Skip to main content

The Mitzvah of Chanukah Candles is Exceedingly Strict - Parashat Vayeshev-Chanukah 5776 - December 4, 2015

Morah Anat Kampf invited me to share words of Torah this week with the Junior High School. What an outstanding group of students! They certainly have excellent skills and were very attentive. What impressed me most was their thoughtfulness and depth in working through the material that I presented. My article this week, based on that class, is drawn primarily from a shiur that Rabbi Yosef Dov Soloveitchik – the Rav – taught regarding Chanukah.

Chanukah commemorates the miracles that Hashem did for the Jewish People in saving them from the hand of Antiochus. This miracle created the opportunity for them to subsequently rededicate the Beit HaMikdash. The Rabbis of that generation created the holiday of Chanukah to serve as a time dedicated to reflecting on those miracles and praising and thanking Hashem for His miracles. HaRambam, Maimonides, teaches, “the commandment of Chanukah candles is a very beloved and precious mitzvah. A person must be careful to publicize the miracle and add praise and thanks to Hashem for the miracles that He did for us. Even if a person subsists off of charity, he or she should borrow money or sell his or her clothes to buy oil and candles in order to light Chanukah candles.”

The last portion of HaRambam’s law is surprising. On what basis does the halacha demand that a person borrow money or sell his clothing in order to fulfill this mitzvah? This law is particularly perplexing when we consider the following universal principle in halacha – a person should not spend more than 20% of his assets on the performance of a mitzvah (hamebazbez, al yevazbez yoter mechomesh). Consider as an example the mitzvah of lulav. If a person had only has $100 to his name, halacha would demand only that he spend up to $20 – no more. Applying this principle to the case of Chanukah candles, one would expect that a person would only be obligated to spend up to 20% of his or her assets – not to borrow or sell one’s clothing! Why is a person held to a higher expectation for the mitzvah of Chanukah candles than for other mitzvot?

In fact, there is one other case in which a person has to sell his clothing or borrow money to fulfill a mitzvah – purchasing wine for the four cups on Seder night. What is the commonality between the mitzvot of Chanukah candles and wine for the four cups?

Both mitzvot are designed to publicize a miracle – to accomplish pirsumei nisah. However, our question still stands – why do mitzvot that accomplish pirsumei nisah have such a strict standard?

The Rav explains that when we publicize the miracles that Hashem did for the Jewish People we accomplish another mitzvah – kiddush haShem – sanctifying G-d’s Name. He explains that the strict standard that the Torah has for sanctifying G-d’s Name is directly connected to the strict standard that the Torah has for someone who is confronted with a choice to profane G-d’s Name or die – he should not profane His Name even on pain of death. The Rav explains that the Torah obligates a person not to miss the opportunity to sanctify G-d’s Name even at great cost. For this reason, halacha demands that we even borrow money, if necessary, to publicize the miracle of Chanukah.

With the lighting of the Chanukah candles, we sanctify Hashem’s Name by reminding ourselves and projecting to the world the Torah values of holiness and morality and the sanctity of the Jewish People and of life itself. May this coming Chanukah usher in a renewed commitment to these values by our families, community and for the entire world.


Shabbat Shalom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Honor and Glory - Parashat Termuah 5780, February 28, 2020

This week’s  parasha , Termuah, and next week’s parasha , Tetzave, introduce Hashem’s command regarding the plans for the  mishkan  and its vessels – including the clothing worn by the  kohanim . One of the vessels that Hashem commands to be built is the  menorah  – the candelabra. The description of the plans for the menorah are described in Parashat Terumah and the description of its service is described in Parashat Tetzave. In Parashat Tetzave, the Torah says, “and they will take for you pure olive oil pressed to be lit to raise an everlasting candle.” Each evening the  kohanim  were obligated to light the candelabra with enough oil to last the night. In the morning, the  kohanim  were obligated to fix and relight the  menorah , as necessary, thus ensuring that the candelabra would constantly be lit. The Rambam – Maimonides – explains, based on a later verse, that the  mitzvah  to light the candelabra in the mishkan creates “honor and glory” for the  mishkan . It seems obvious

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor