Skip to main content

Yisrael and Ya'akov - Parashat Vayishlach 5780 - December 13, 2019


The Jewish people are called b’nei Yisrael – the children of Israel. The name Yisrael has its roots in our parasha.

Upon leaving the company of Lavan, Yaakov embarks on his return to Cana’an. Yaakov, preparing for a potential confrontation, sends angels to Esav who dwelt in Edom – far south of where Yaakov was at Ma’avar Yabok in the north. The angels return to Yaakov to tell him that Esav is already on the road – headed to meet with him. Yaakov, anticipating a fight, becomes fearful.

On the evening prior to his fateful meeting with Esav, Yaakov encounters a man – understood by our Rabbis to be the guardian angel of Esav. The angel struggles with Yaakov and they end in a draw. Yaakov’s thigh is damaged. The angel declares, “What is your name?” Yaakov responds, “Yaakov!” The angel continues, “Your name will no longer be Yaakov, but Yisrael (Israel), because you have struggled with the Lord and with men – and you have been able (to overcome).” It is through this incident that Jacob acquired the name, Israel.

The acquisition of new names is not an infrequent occurrence throughout the Torah. Avraham’s name was changed from Avram. Sarah’s name was changed from Sarai. Yehoshua’s name is changed from Hoshea. Yaakov’s name is seemingly changed by this adversary to Yisrael. Apparently, for this reason, we are 
b’nei Yisrael – the children of Israel – not b’nei Yaakov – the children of Yaakov.

Our 
chachamim explain that this renaming was unique. In the cases of Avraham, Sarah and Yehoshua, these individuals were given a replacement name. However, Jacob was given an alternate name by this adversary – the name Israel. Upon leaving the struggle with the angel, Yaakov had two names – Yaakov and Yisrael. A substitute name conveys a totally new identity created upon by an awareness or change in circumstance. An alternate name is a more subtle change. Such a name conveys an additional dimension or mission in a person. Consider, for example, a stage name or a pseudonym. Alternate names are used situationally.

The 
Ohr HaChayim, Rabbenu Chayyim Ben-Attar, explains that in general, the Torah calls Yaakov by the name Yaakov during a period of struggle in his life and by the name Yisrael during a period of spiritual calmness or spiritual resolution. The name Yaakov – Yaakov’s given name – refers to struggle – the struggle of Yaakov holding onto his brother, Esav’s, heel. While this name originated to describe his struggle with his brother Esav, Yaakov is also an apt description of his life – a life of confrontation and struggle that originated in Rivkah’s womb and lasted for 130 years. After confronting the adversary, Yaakov now had another name – Yisrael. This name is used to describe the resulting peace that Yaakov experienced in the wake of conflict, a type of spiritual serenity.


Interestingly, throughout our 
parasha, Yaakov is not called Yisrael. Later in our parasha, for example, two of Yaakov’s sons, Shimon and Levi, acted violently to protect their sister, Dinah. In this incident, these children are called b’nei Yaakov, instead of the appellation, b’nei Yisrael, Based on the Ohr HaChayim’s explanation, we can readily understand why this name is used in this situation. The term b’nei – the sons of – refers to Shimon and Levi cooperating towards a specific aim. The term Yaakov – Jacob – conveys their aim represents a struggle. Yaakov’s children were struggling together to exact justice from Shechem. Therefore, they are called b’nei Yaakov – a communal struggle – one group identified with one aim. There is, however, another type of collective – a community built on spiritual harmony. The Jewish People are typically called b’nei Yisrael – the children of Israel. This name conveys our aim – that of a collective based on spiritual serenity.

Based on the Ohr HaChayim’s explanation we can delineate two purposes or aims of the Jewish community – solidarity to strengthen ourselves in conflicts that we may have with the world at large. This purpose is conveyed by the term 
b’nei Yaakov. However, there is another, equally important aim that we have – the responsibility to support ourselves in strengthening our internal values - this aim is conveyed by the term b’nei Yisrael.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor