Skip to main content

Learning From Our Children - Parashat Chaye Sarah 5780, November 22, 2019


This week’s parasha, Chaye Sarah, opens with the death of Sarah Imeinu – the mother of our nation. This presentation comes on the heels of the end of last week’s parasha – the discussion of the binding of Isaac and the discussion of the proliferation of Avraham’s extended family.

The verse at the beginning of this week’s 
parasha states, “And Sarah died in Kiryat Arba, which is Chevron, in the Land of Canaan; and Avraham came to eulogize Sarah and to cry over her.” Our Chachamim discuss the phrase, “and Avraham came” - from where was he was coming to eulogize his recently departed wife?

The Midrash offers two possibilities of where he was coming from. Rabbi Levi teaches that he was returning from burying his father, Terach. Rabbi Yose teaches that he was returning from Har HaMoriah – Avraham was returning from the episode of the binding of Isaac. According to Rabbi Yose, Sarah died out of the pain of hearing about the episode.

Both Rabbi Levi and Rabbi Yose agree that the subject that precedes Sarah’s death in the Torah is connected to Sarah’s death. However, they disagree regarding the specific topic that connects directly to Sarah’s death – the binding of Isaac or the expansion of Avraham’s family. Rabbi Levi maintains that the section that directly precedes the death of Sarah – the expansion of Avraham’s family – gives context to the discussion of Sarah’s death – Avraham sequentially attended to his father’s death and his wife’s death. Rabbi Yose maintains that the expansion of Avraham’s family is merely a detail – the Binding of Isaac is the big incident that precedes Sarah’s death and established the cause of Sarah’s death, her pain over hearing the news.

The commentator, Anat Yosef, further discusses Rabbi Levi’s teaching that Avraham returned to eulogize Sarah from burying his father and explains the import of this fact. Anaf Yosef writes that although the Torah is not clear as to what prompted Avraham to be in Charan to bury his father – perhaps he had gone there originally to see his growing extended family or perhaps Hashem commanded him to go there specifically to bury his father – the fact that Avraham buried his father is a statement of the stature of Terach. According to Anaf Yosef, if Avraham buried Terach, it is a sign of Terach’s righteousness – Terach must have abandoned his idolatrous ways and repented.

The Torah often presents the parent-child relationship as one of giver and recipient. The parent teaches and the child learns. The parent supports and the child is supported. The parent leads and the child is led. However, the case of Terach and Avraham serves as a very different model. Reading both the Torah and the Midrash, we see that Avraham taught Terach about the Oneness of Hashem. Avraham led Terach and his family away from Ur Casdim. Avraham gave and his father, Terach, received. In the case of Avraham and Terach, the parent-child relationship was flipped. Apparently, Rabbi Levi, according to Anaf Yosef’s interpretation, teaches that Avraham’s impact on his father was so great as to create the opportunity for Terach to do 
teshuva – to repent. Terach’s merit in turning away from idolatry created the obligation for Avraham to bury him in Charan.

As parents, our primary role is to give to our children. We teach, guide and provide for them. However, Avraham teaches that children should also seek to influence their parents and Terach teaches that parents should be open to being influenced by their children. It is understandably difficult for a parent to learn from his or her child. Such a change in the relationship requires humility and a willingness to grow on the part of the parent. However, children do have so much to offer their parents. Our children offer us a different and, hopefully thoughtful, perspective. When presented respectfully, we can offer our own parents a different, and hopefully thoughtful, perspective. Just as Avraham taught Terach and Terach learned from Avraham, we should seek to be a positive influence on our parents and be willing to be influenced positively by our own children.

Shabbat Shalom,    Rabbi Benjy Owen

(This article was originally printed in 2017)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dwelling Securely - Parashat Behar 5779, May 24, 2019

Our seventh and eighth grade students returned this past week from the ten-day Junior High Israel Experience program. Mrs. Anat Kampf, Chazzan Ricky Kampf and I were honored to chaperone this inaugural program, and, on behalf of the students, we are very thankful to the parents, to the community and Lemsky Fund for their support of this endeavor.
Our students soaked up the land, the people and the Torah of Eretz Yisrael. At school, we learn Torah. In Israel, we experienced the Torah. At school we learn about the impact and significance of the State of Israel. In Israel, we experienced the geography, history and people of the State of Israel. In school, we learn Ivrit. In Israel, we spoke Ivrit.
Our students experienced the breadth and depth of the land. They had both an urban experience – sleeping in Yerushalayim for six days – and a more pastoral experience – sleeping in Kibbutz Lavi. They visited sites of destruction and death that now have renewed vitality and significance – the Ko…

The Antidote to Arrogance - Parshat Tazria 5779 - April 5, 2019

This and next week’s parshiyot are called torat hanegaim – the laws related to tzara’at – the Divine Punishment of an “eruption” – a nega – on the home, clothing and/or skin. Tzara'at is not a naturally occurring disease in the sense that its cause is not exposure to disease nor is it communicable. Rather, tzara'at is a Divine Punishment brought on by sin. Rashi explains that this punishment is prominently associated with two sins - lashon hara – sins of speech – and gasot haruach – arrogance.

Some averot – like not eating kosher food or having illicit relationships – typically stem from physical desire. Others – such as not believing in the existence of G-d – can stem from a philosophical mistake. But averot like lashon hara and gasot haruach are members of a unique class of sins. These are sins that stem from a character flaw – a problem in the person’s personality.

In next week’s parasha, Rashi teaches a foundational principle about tzara'at: the process of atonement fo…

Accepting Guidance - Parashat Shemini 5779 - March 29, 2019

This week’s parasha, Shemini, deals with the eighth and final day of the inauguration of the mishkan.
At the beginning of the parasha, the Torah presents a list of korbanot – sacrifices – that are to be offered on this inauguration day. Two of these sacrifices include a command for Aharon to bring a calf as a sin offering and for the People of Israel to bring a goat as a sin offering. Rav Matis Blum, in his sefer, Torah Le’Daat, discusses why, on the final day of the dedication of the mishkan, there was a command to offer not one, but two, sin offerings – Aharon’s calf and B’nei Yisrael’s goat.
Maimonides, in his Guide to the Perplexed, suggests reasons why specific animals were commanded to be offered in the mishkan and in the beit hamikdash. In discussing the calf and the goat as sin offerings, HaRambam explains that each of these animals has an association with a previous sin of the Jewish People. The Rambam suggests that the calf is connected to the sin of the Golden Calf. On this …