Skip to main content

Motivating Growth - Parashat Kedoshim 5779 - May 10th, 2019


This week’s parasha, Parashat Kedoshim, presents many mitzvot (both positive and negative). These mitzvot deal with a number of subjects, including justice, exclusive belief in Hashem and the prohibition of immorality.

After detailing a number of these 
mitzvot, the Torah concludes, “and you will observe (shmira) all of My statutes (chukim) and all of My ordinances (mishpatim) and you will do (asiah) them; I am Hashem.” The Italian commentator, Rabbi Ovadiah Seforno, is perplexed by the difference between observing and doing – shmira and asiah. Observing and doing seem to be very similar!

To further consider this question, let us look at the well-known commitment made by b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai – na’aseh ve’nishma – we will do and we will listen. When we consider this pronouncement more closely, we understand that “listening” cannot refer to learning about the mitzvot – how could b'nei yisrael keep the mitzvot without learning about them? “Listening” must refer to something else.

Rabbi Ovadiah Seforno explains that “listening” refers to following the command of Hashem without a motivation to receive a reward. Hence, 
na’aseh ve’nishma means that b’nei yisrael committed at Mount Sinai to follow the commandments without a concern for the reward.

Returning to the verse from our 
parasha, what is the difference between “observing” and “doing”? Seforno explains that the “observance” that the Torah wants from us is a recognition of the value of the commandments through analysis and study. The commandments have intrinsic value – far greater than the value of external reward. When we come to observe the mitzvot in this way, we will come to do them.



Seforno’s analysis of this verse corresponds to my experience as a teacher and as a parent. I can think of many examples in which a child has incorporated a new mitzva practice after learning about the halachot of the mitzva. I can also think of many examples in which a child has incorporated a new mitzva practice after learning the philosophy or root ideas that the mitzva conveys. Our children and students are usually very responsive to learning about the specifics of how to keep Shabbat or how to pray or how to make sure that food is kosher. Our children and students – particularly older ones – are also typically very responsive to learning about the “why” of this or that mitzva.

Seforno argues that it is less than optimal to perform 
mitzvot for the sake of receiving a reward. He also argues that through learning about mitzvot and analyzing mitzvot, we recognize the value of mitzvot and we are likely to keep them. People need motivation to adopt a new behavior or value. By studying mitzvot, we develop a motivation to keep the mitzvot – the recognition of their value – that will likely lead us to the ultimate motivation – the desire to do the Will of our Creator.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor