Skip to main content

Cultivating Sensitivity - Parashat Achare Mot 5779 - May 4, 2019


In this week’s parasha, Achare Mot, the Torah says, “And any man of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among them, that takes in hunting any beast or fowl that may be eaten; he will pour out the blood of it, and cover it with dust.” These pesukim present the mitzvah of kisui hadam - covering the blood of chayyot/wild animals (such as deer) and ofot/birds. Domesticated animals do not require kisui hadam. Interestingly, the commentator Ohr HaChayyim interprets from the verse that the Torah is carving out an exception to a general prohibition – Jews are permitted to hunt wild animals that may be eaten because they are kosher, but no other species may be hunted.

The author of the Sefer HaChinuch lists the mitzvah of 
kisui hadam as one of the mitzvot taught in this week’s parasha. He explains that the mitzvah aims to help limit cruelty and callousness. To eat the animal in front of the spilled blood would be to act cruelly and callously. Covering the blood of such an animal avoids cruelty.

In what way is eating in front of the spilled blood of an animal considered cruel behavior? Cruelty is generally associated with causing pain. Killing the animal for food is not considered cruel. Where is the cruelty in this case of not covering the blood?

To more fully understand this idea, we need to look at the following verse. The Torah says, “For as to the life of all flesh, the blood of it is all one with the life of it; therefore I said unto the children of Israel: You will eat the blood of no manner of flesh; for the life of all flesh is its blood; whoever eats it shall be cut off.”

To summarize: 
· The blood represents the life/soul of the animal
· There is a prohibition to eat the blood of an animal
· An animal is a living thing. It is a sentient being. It has a nefesh – a life force. In reality, killing an animal is killing a living thing. It is an act of aggression. 

Before the time of Noach, humans did not need to eat meat and meat was prohibited. After the flood, it seems that human constitution changed. Humanity generally needed meat after the flood. Therefore, after the time of Noach, G-d permitted humans to eat meat. However, this permit only exists because of man’s needs.

The Torah prohibits a callous treatment of the animal. The Torah prohibits a demonstration of superfluous aggression towards the animal. The Torah demands that we cover the blood and not eat in front of it like a lion would eat its prey. Demonstrating any unnecessary aggression towards an animal would contravene the philosophy of the Torah. 



When we think of animal cruelty, we usually think of inflicting unnecessary pain on an animal. While this type of cruelty is also prohibited, it is not the type of cruelty that the Sefer HaChinuch is referring to. The Sefer HaChinuch is discussing the proper attitude towards all living things.

Each and every one of us has an aggressive part to our personality – some more and some less. This aggression can be very beneficial. It helps us to defend ourselves when necessary and to cope with adversity. Aggression can also be a tool of destruction. Cruelty begins with viewing other living things as an appropriate object of our aggression. The Torah recognizes that the quality of cruelty can begin innocuously and morph into something far more destructive. Paroh’s Egypt and Hitler’s Germany are just two of many examples in history in which a nation begins by legalizing minor displays of aggression only to subsequently become a nation in which the most sadistic behavior is sanctioned and considered praise-worthy. The Torah recognizes that an individual’s metamorphosis can take a similar arc.

This 
mitzvah of kisui hadam – covering the blood – represents a proper Torah outlook. G-d designed the world for man’s benefit. When we use the world properly, man produces wonderful results. Harm comes when we use the world as a tool for us to express our most basic instincts. G-d allowed us to use the animal world for our benefit – when the benefit serves a real need. This mitzvah demonstrates that our use of the animal world should not include using it as an outlet for our aggression.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor