Skip to main content

Coping with Insecurity - Ki Tisa 5779 - February 22, 2019


This week’s parasha, Ki Tisa, describes the sin of the Golden Calf.

For forty days after Hashem’s revelation at Mount Sinai, b'nei yisrael had been anxiously awaiting Moshe’s return. The Torah says, “and the nation saw that Moshe delayed (boshesh) to come down from the mountain.”

There is a well-known Midrash on this verse.
Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: What is the significance of the Torah using the word boshesh – ‘And the nation saw that Moshe was boshesh, coming late’? Do not read the word as boshesh – coming late – rather – ba’u shesh – six hours of the day came (and went). The Midrash continues: When Moshe ascended to heaven, he told b’nei yisrael that he would return at the end of 40 days at the beginning of the sixth hour. B’nei yisrael thought that the day that he ascended was to be included in the count of 40 days, when in fact, Moshe said 40 complete days. He had ascended on the seventh of Sivan and he intended to return on the seventeenth of Tammuz. On the fortieth day, which was the sixteenth of Tammuz, Satan came and confused the world by showing a picture of darkness and black which conveyed to the world that Moshe had died because the sixth hour had already come and gone. The people became convinced that Moshe had gone up to heaven and died – never to return. The Midrash explains that the people’s assumption that Moshe had died led to the sin of the Golden Calf.

Our Sages wrote Midrashim in order to convey lessons about how we should live our lives and how we should properly serve Hashem. What is the subject of this Midrash? What does it teach us?

The Midrash is attempting to identify what prompted b’nei yisrael to commit the sin of the Golden Calf. What lured this nation who had witnessed Hashem’s miracles in Egypt, at the Red Sea and in the desert and who had experienced the revelation at Mount Sinai into committing this most heinous offense – idolatry? How could this holy people sink to such decrepitude?

The topic of Satan and an explanation of its nature is beyond the scope of this article. However, one conclusion that we can draw from this Midrash is that 
Satan was an influence on a part of the nation’s psyche over which they were not totally in control. B’nei yisrael was an insecure people. They had a slave mentality left over from their experiences in Egypt. By conjuring up images of darkness and bleakness, Satan influenced the people to believe that their worst fear had come true – Moshe had died and left them leaderless. To assuage their own fears, the people created and then worshiped the Golden Calf.


On one level, the Midrash seems to be conveying a very fatalistic message – there are certain feelings or conclusions over which we have no control. Through mere suggestion, Satan can influence us at any time to feel the most terrifying feelings. This idea leads us to a very disturbing question - if human beings are so impressionable, why was b’nei yisrael held culpable for the sin of the Golden Calf?

Apparently, the Midrash is teaching us that while we do not always have control about how we feel, we are expected to assert control over how we act in the face of that fear. Do we try to deal or do we attempt to twist the truth in order to assuage the fear? This decision – to cope or to distort – is one of the greatest tests in life. B’nei yisrael was held accountable for creating and worshiping the Golden Calf – not for fearing Moshe’s death. Triggers for our deepest fears can be all around us. When confronted with these fears, our challenge is to resist the urge to assuage them with actions that are immoral.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

On Learning Torah - Parashat Beshalach 5778, January 26, 2018

This week’s parasha , Parashat Beshalach, describes the final steps of the liberation of the Jewish People from Egypt. In last week’s parasha , the Torah describes b’nei yisrael leaving Egypt. After destroying the Egyptian firstborns, Hashem guided b’nei yisrael out of Egypt – leaving Ra’amses on the way to Sukkot. The Torah then inexplicably leaves aside the exodus story and introduces a series of commandments – specifically, the mitzvot of Pesach, tefilin , and redeeming the first born. The Torah resumes the exodus story in the beginning of our parasha . Why does the Torah interrupt the exodus story with the presentation of specific mitzvot? In resuming the exodus story, the Torah writes: vayasev Elokim et ha’am derecho yam suf; vachamushim alu b’nei yisrael me’eretz mitzrayim – And Hashem took the nation the long way, the way of the desert to the Reed Sea; and the children of Israel brought arms up from the land of Egypt. (Shemot 13:18) The Midrash is puzzled by the Torah’s incl

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe