Skip to main content

When "Thank You" is Too Difficult - Parashat Ki Tavo 5778, August 31, 2018


This week’s parasha, Parashat Ki Tavo, opens with a presentation of the mitzvah of the bikkurim. Bikkurim are a farmer’s first fruits which the Torah commands us to offer in service of Hashem.
The Torah commands that the offering of the bikkurim must be accompanied by a declaration called mikra bikkurim.

              “And you will call out and say before the Lord, your G-d, ‘An Aramean (sought to) destroy my forefather, and he went down to Egypt and sojourned there with a small number of people, and there, he became a great nation, mighty and numerous. And the Egyptians demonized and afflicted us, and they imposed hard labor upon us. So we cried out to the Lord, G-d of our fathers, and the Lord heard our voice and saw our affliction, our toil and our oppression. And the Lord brought us out from Egypt with a strong hand and with an outstretched arm, with great awe, and with signs and wonders. And He brought us to this place, and He gave us this land, a land flowing with milk and honey.’”

This identical text serves as the backbone of the maggid portion of the haggadah on Pesach, in which we recite each of the verses above and share Rabbinic interpretation of each verse. Thus, Jews are obligated to tell the story of the exodus from Egypt twice – once on Pesach and once when offering the bikkurim.

The Rav, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, suggests that these two obligations, to tell the story of the exodus from Egypt on Pesach and when offering the bikkurim, are rooted in the concept of hakarat hatov, expressing gratitude for the good that Hashem did for the Jewish People in redeeming our people from Egypt. In the haggadah, we say song – shira – regarding the exodus; in mikra bikkurim, we give praise to Hashem – shevach – about the exodus.

In Tanach, shira, song, is always associated with praise. However, mikra bikkurim is the recitation of the narrative above. Thus praise embedded in mikra bikkurim is not obvious. The Rav explains that the recitation of this narrative is what constitutes the praise of Hashem. Similar to the praise that we convey through reading the narrative of Megilat Esther on Purim, telling the story of the exodus from Egypt is, by itself, praise of Hashem. As the Rav says, “the thanksgiving is implicit in the narration itself. All one is required to do is tell the truth.” (Chumash Masoret HaRav)

As parents and as educators, it is incumbent upon us to teach our children and students to freely express gratitude when others have done good for us. In this vein, it is also important for us to teach our children and students to recognize that Hashem constantly does good for us. Expressing gratitude is often difficult – particularly for children. How can we help our children and students to overcome this difficulty?

Employing the Rav’s idea, praise can be accomplished in two ways: through “singing” another’s praises and through recounting the specifics of how the other has created good for you. I have found that the first type of praise is far more difficult than the second type. It is often easier to tell a story of the good things that another has done for you (“that man gave me a lollipop in shul!”) than express gratitude for that good thing (“thank you for giving me a lollipop!”). This concept offers parents and teachers an alternate strategy when children have difficulty acknowledging gratitude – have them tell the story of the good that they received. This story is, in itself, praise, and can serve as an opening to teach a child to show gratitude.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor