Skip to main content

The Power of Generosity - Parashat Naso 5778 - May, 25, 2018


This week’s parasha, Parashat Nasso, presents the law of the sotah – a wife whose husband has become suspicious that she has had an extra-marital affair.

The Torah teaches, in summary, that such a husband would bring his wife to the kohen and offer a korban-a minchat kena’ot. Subsequently, the kohen has the woman drink this offering together with other ingredients to miraculously test the woman’s fidelity: if she had been unfaithful, she and her paramour would die. If, however, she had been faithful, she would be blessed to conceive a child from her husband.
One interpretive technique that our chachamim use in service of understanding the Chumash is semichoot haparshiyot – lessons to be learned from the juxtaposition of sections of the Torah. Often, particularly in the more narrative sections of the Torah, the connection between one section of the Torah and the next requires no explanation. For example, the episode surrounding the destruction of Sedom is immediately preceded by Avraham’s pleading with Hashem on behalf of the city. This type of juxtaposition requires no explanation – the narrative is seamless. However, there are other sections of the Torah, often the more halachic sections, that seemingly jump from one unrelated topic to another. It is for these sections that our chachamim often use the technique of semichoot haparshiyot to elucidate the Torah.

The aforementioned passage concerning the sotah is preceded by a presentation of laws related to gifts made to a kohen – specifically, that gifts, such as terumah, that a person is obligated to give to a kohen must, in fact, be given to the kohen and become his property. Our chachamim ask why the Torah juxtaposes the section regarding gifts to a kohen and the seemingly unrelated section regarding the law of the sotah. Using the technique of semichoot haparshiyot, the gemara in Masechet Berachot (63a) explains that a person who does not give obligatory gifts to the kohen will eventually require a kohen to intervene on behalf of his marriage – through the law of sotah.

This statement by our Rabbis, that denying the kohen his due will lead a person to need a kohen certainly carries an ironic and literary flair. However, how does this phenomenon occur?

The author of Torah Temimah, Rabbi Baruch Epstein HaLevy, explains that the same stingy and jealous qualities which impel a person to deny a kohen his due also lead that person to deny his wife basic financial needs. Out of this state of privation, the woman may seek assistance from a man outside of her marriage. To elaborate, compulsive stinginess and jealousy are symptoms of a pathological need for control over the material world and material possessions. This irrational need causes this individual to shirk his financial responsibility to the Kohen and to his wife.

It is not a stretch to suggest that the inverse of this teaching is also true – being generous to those communal people and institutions (the kohanim mentioned by the Torah) who rely on us for financial support will lead to uplifting and strong relationships with one’s spouse and, by extension, with one’s family. The feelings of support and trust that are manifest in generosity reorient a person’s relationship with the material world and possessions. This person comes to learn that material blessing is not an end in itself; material blessing is a tool which helps us and those around us build a more holy and spiritually perfected world.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Learning Torah - Parashat Beshalach 5778, January 26, 2018

This week’s parasha , Parashat Beshalach, describes the final steps of the liberation of the Jewish People from Egypt. In last week’s parasha , the Torah describes b’nei yisrael leaving Egypt. After destroying the Egyptian firstborns, Hashem guided b’nei yisrael out of Egypt – leaving Ra’amses on the way to Sukkot. The Torah then inexplicably leaves aside the exodus story and introduces a series of commandments – specifically, the mitzvot of Pesach, tefilin , and redeeming the first born. The Torah resumes the exodus story in the beginning of our parasha . Why does the Torah interrupt the exodus story with the presentation of specific mitzvot? In resuming the exodus story, the Torah writes: vayasev Elokim et ha’am derecho yam suf; vachamushim alu b’nei yisrael me’eretz mitzrayim – And Hashem took the nation the long way, the way of the desert to the Reed Sea; and the children of Israel brought arms up from the land of Egypt. (Shemot 13:18) The Midrash is puzzled by the Torah’s incl

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe