Skip to main content

Shabbat HaGadol - Parashat Tzav 5778, March 23, 2018

This Shabbat, the Shabbat immediately preceding Pesach, is customarily given a special name, “Shabbat HaGadol” – the Great Shabbat. Indeed, on this Shabbat HaGadol, we read a special Haftarah ending with the verse, “Behold! I send you Eliyahu HaNavi, before the great (gadol) and awesome day of Hashem.”

The Midrash offers another rationale which may explain this unique appellation given to this Shabbat before Pesach. A great miracle, explains the Midrash, occurred on that Shabbat before Pesach. It was the “Shabbat of a Great Miracle.” Like our Pesach, the exodus from Egypt occurred on the 15th of Nissan. The exodus occurred on a Thursday. Thus, the Shabbat prior to the exodus from Egypt occurred on the 10th of Nissan. The Jewish People had a unique obligation on that 10th of Nissan – the year of the exodus. Each family was commanded to take the lamb that they would be slaughtering for the korban pesach and to tie it to their bedpost in anticipation of that upcoming momentous night. Beginning on that 10th of Nissan, the Jews would lie in bed listening to the sound of the sheep “baaaing”.

The Egyptians worshipped cattle and viewed them as divine. For the Egyptians, this act of tying up the sheep in anticipation of slaughtering them as a sacrifice was a great religious affront. If they would have had their way, the Egyptians would have attacked the Jews and killed them on the spot for this affront to their object of veneration. The Midrash explains that Hashem protected the Jewish People from the Egyptians’ wrath for these four days beginning on that Shabbat, the 10th of Nissan. In commemoration of this great miracle, the Shabbat prior to Pesach is called Shabbat HaGadol – the Great Shabbat.

Participating in this commandment demonstrated unbelievable commitment by the Jewish People to their belief in Hashem. The whole Egyptian society professed the divine quality of cattle – these Jews, in adherence to Hashem’s command, prepared to slaughter a sheep. The Jewish People did not shy away from breaching the norms of Egyptian society and exposing themselves to this existential threat. For this dedication, they merited Hashem’s protection with the miracle of the Great Shabbat.

These Jews are special role models for us and our children. Like Egyptian society, twenty-first century Western society is a very advanced society, offering its citizens many, many benefits. While our society has also advanced morally and philosophically, there are beliefs and mores in our society that contravene the Torah approach. In areas such as the primacy of thinking and education, modesty (in thinking and action) and morality, Torah and Western society do not see eye-to-eye. Our children are often caught in the middle, being pulled by two sets of expectations – Jewish and Western. As an example, I regularly speak to students who are uncomfortable living their values by going “into the street” wearing a kippah and tzitzit or in a modest outfit. It is incumbent upon us as parents to uphold our ancestors as models of commitment and dedication to our Torah values. We can communicate this lesson best by teaching our children about these heroes and by consistently exhibiting our own dedication to our Torah values even when they contravene the ambient culture.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Promoting Justice through Litigant Participation - Parashat Mishpatim 5776 - February 5, 2016

Parashat Mishpatim continues the Torah’s presentation, which began in last week’s parasha , of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai. One of the topics that is shared between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity. The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes. In last week’s parasha, the Torah records Yitro’s suggestion of the four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the quality of commitment to truth. Rashi explains that these are trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render. The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-wor