Skip to main content

Adding and Subtracting - Parashat Re-eh 5776 - September 2, 2016

Torat Hashem Temimah Meshivat Nafesh – G-d’s Torah is perfect; restoring the soul.

Besides being one of my favorite songs to sing on Simchat Torah, this verse from Tehilim describes the Torah as being perfect. This week’s parasha explains one aspect of the perfection of the Torah.

Parashat Re’eh continues the explication of Moshe Rabbenu’s tochacha – his rebuke of the Jewish People. In this rebuke, Moshe discusses the mitzvot of bal tosif and bal tigra – to not add or subtract from the mitzvot of the Torah. Our sages teach us that the Torah is comprised of taryag – there are 613 mitzvot in the Torah. These two mitzvot teach that the Jewish People are not permitted to add a 614th commandment or to remove one of the 613 commandments from taryag.

The Seforno gives some context to each of these commandments. Concerning the prohibition of adding to the Torah, he explains that this mitzvah is designed to prevent a person adding something which is detestable to Hashem, even something that may seem like a service of Hashem. Concerning the prohibition of subtracting to the Torah, he explains that, at times, people may feel that the reason for a certain commandment no longer applies and that, consequently, the commandment no longer applies.

At first glance, Seforno’s comments seem somewhat difficult. Bal tosif and bal tigra are presented by the Torah as a pair – neither add nor subtract. However, Seforno’s explanation seems to provide very different rationales for the two prohibitions – do not allow yourself to do something detestable to Hashem in the name of serving Him and do not allow yourself to think that a commandment no longer applies.

Apparently, Seforno understands that these two prohibitions stem from the same error in thinking – a personal judgement about G-d’s Will is a reasonable substitute for Hashem’s declaration of His Will through the mitzvot. In fact, Hashem has shared with us His Will through taryag – the 613 commandments. In the case of bal tosif, the Torah prohibits a person (or a Jewish court) from acting on the thought that he can determine how Hashem should be served. The Torah prohibits us from adding a new mitzva. In the case of bal tigra, the Torah prohibits a person (or Jewish court) from acting on the thought that he can determine the ultimate reasons for the mitzvot. The Torah prohibits us from subtracting a mitzva.

One of the ideas that the verse, Torat Hashem Temimah Meshivat Nafesh – G-d’s Torah is perfect; restoring the soul – conveys is that Hashem gave us a perfect Torah. Hashem is perfect and His Will is unchanging. As a product of His Will, the Torah is not subject to change – and certainly not subject to alteration based on human whim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

On Learning Torah - Parashat Beshalach 5778, January 26, 2018

This week’s parasha , Parashat Beshalach, describes the final steps of the liberation of the Jewish People from Egypt. In last week’s parasha , the Torah describes b’nei yisrael leaving Egypt. After destroying the Egyptian firstborns, Hashem guided b’nei yisrael out of Egypt – leaving Ra’amses on the way to Sukkot. The Torah then inexplicably leaves aside the exodus story and introduces a series of commandments – specifically, the mitzvot of Pesach, tefilin , and redeeming the first born. The Torah resumes the exodus story in the beginning of our parasha . Why does the Torah interrupt the exodus story with the presentation of specific mitzvot? In resuming the exodus story, the Torah writes: vayasev Elokim et ha’am derecho yam suf; vachamushim alu b’nei yisrael me’eretz mitzrayim – And Hashem took the nation the long way, the way of the desert to the Reed Sea; and the children of Israel brought arms up from the land of Egypt. (Shemot 13:18) The Midrash is puzzled by the Torah’s incl

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe