Skip to main content

If and When - Parashat Ekev 5776 - August 26, 2016

This week’s parasha, Ekev, presents the continuation of Moshe Rabbenu’s exhortation to the Jewish People – a Jewish People on the cusp of inheriting the Land of Israel and on the verge of losing their leader, Moshe. Moshe Rabbenu says to the people, “If /when (כי) you will say in your hearts: these nations are great, how can I dispossess them? Do not be afraid of them! You will surely remember that which Hashem did to Pharoah and all of Egypt.” (Devarim 7:17-18)

The great commentator, Rabbenu Ovadiah Seforno, addresses himself to the Torah’s use of the word ki. Our Rabbis teach us that ki has four possible meanings – two of which are "if" and "when". Which translation is appropriate in this context?

Seforno suggests that the correct meaning here is “when”. He expounds: when you say, “How can I dispossess them since they are more numerous than I am,” do not say so because you fear them, but because you recognize that this would, indeed, be impossible were it not for G-d’s help, and this is the meaning of “you will surely remember that which Hashem did to Pharoah and all of Egypt,” who were more numerous and far greater than you. (Translation from Rabbi Raphael Pelcovitz)

This is truly an amazing comment! At first glance, I would have read these verses as an admonition – a rebuke of those among the Jewish People who were fearful about entering the Land. I would have assumed that Moshe Rabbenu was castigating these people and telling them that they have no business asking the question, “How can I dispossess them?” given what Hashem did to Pharoah and the Egyptians. I would have translated ki as “if”. However, this is not Seforno’s perspective. He translates ki as “when” – “When you ask … how can I dispossess them?” The Torah is exhorting such a questioner to not be fearful and to remember what Hashem has already done.

Apparently, according to Seforno, the question, on its face, is not inappropriate. Such a question might stem from an insecurity. But it may also stem from a recognition of the power differential between the Jewish People and the Caananites. Either way, the question itself is appropriate. Moshe Rabbenu is exhorting the people to not allow the question to devolve into un-grounded insecurity. Hashem will be with the Jewish People as He promised.

This is an important lesson for all of us. The Torah expects us to ask questions – even difficult questions. The questions themselves are of great value. Our test is our reaction to the questions. Moshe Rabbenu is teaching the Jewish People not to lose sight of well-established premises – such as knowledge of Hashem’s Providence – even in the face of difficult questions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unity Through Shared Purpose - Parashat Tetzaveh 5780, March 6, 2020

This coming week, we will celebrate the holiday of Purim. We know that Megilat Esther is the record of the miraculous saving of the Jewish People that occurred in Shushan and in the surrounding areas of King Achashverosh’s reign. One of the culminating themes in the  megila  is the unity within the Jewish People that was forged as a result of this miracle. This unity expressed itself in a number of ways. One of the expressions was the re-acceptance of the Torah that occurred in that generation –  kiyemu ve’kibelu . This re-acceptance included a unified acceptance of the mitzvah of Purim that was legislated by the Anshei Kinesset HaGedola – the Men of Great Assembly. Another expression of this unity is the emphasis on forging brotherhood within the Jewish People – we read the  megila  in big groups, we give money to the poor and we give food gifts to our fellow Jews. Clearly, unity is a fundamental theme of Purim. Given this focus on unity, there is a striking difference between P

Seeking Opportunities to Teach - Parashat Bemidbar - May 26, 2017

This week’s parasha , Bemidbar, recalls the death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah says, “and Nadav and Avihu died before Hashem because they brought foreign fire before Hashem in the Sinai desert; and they had no children.” The context of the incident of Nadav and Avihu is more fully treated in Sefer VaYikra. Moshe communicates Hashem’s command to Aharon and b’nei yisrael to bring ingredients for four different offerings – a chatat , an olah , a shelamim and a mincha – all for the culmination of the inauguration of the mishkan. All of the respective parties brought the proper ingredients to the mishkan in conformity with Hashem’s command. Moshe then gave Hashem’s next command of what to do with these ingredients – the result of which will be G-d’s glory appearing to the nation. Aharon and b’nei yisrael brought their respective offerings in exact conformity with Hashem’s command. Aharon lifted his hands to the nation and blessed them and then descended from pe

Honor and Glory - Parashat Termuah 5780, February 28, 2020

This week’s  parasha , Termuah, and next week’s parasha , Tetzave, introduce Hashem’s command regarding the plans for the  mishkan  and its vessels – including the clothing worn by the  kohanim . One of the vessels that Hashem commands to be built is the  menorah  – the candelabra. The description of the plans for the menorah are described in Parashat Terumah and the description of its service is described in Parashat Tetzave. In Parashat Tetzave, the Torah says, “and they will take for you pure olive oil pressed to be lit to raise an everlasting candle.” Each evening the  kohanim  were obligated to light the candelabra with enough oil to last the night. In the morning, the  kohanim  were obligated to fix and relight the  menorah , as necessary, thus ensuring that the candelabra would constantly be lit. The Rambam – Maimonides – explains, based on a later verse, that the  mitzvah  to light the candelabra in the mishkan creates “honor and glory” for the  mishkan . It seems obvious