Skip to main content

Building a Just Society - Parashat Mishpatim 5779 - February 1, 2019


Parashat Mishpatim continues the presentation of the mitzvot that were revealed to b'nei yisrael at Mount Sinai which began in last week’s parasha. One shared topic between the two parashiyot is the primacy of creating a judicial system with integrity.

The Torah admonishes us not to testify as a group with evil people. The Torah admonishes judges to not show favoritism to a poor person. The Torah forbids judges to accept bribes.

In last week’s parasha, the Torah records that Yitro suggests four qualities that a judge should have: accomplished, G-d-fearing, committed to truth and money-despising. Basing himself on the Mechilta, Rashi elaborates on the third quality – commitment to truth. Rashi explains that judges must be trust-worthy people, and that, because it is reasonable to rely on them generally, people will listen to the judgments that they render.

The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-worthiness is a measure of a person’s dedication to being truthful. If a person says that he or she will do something and doesn’t do it, the value that that person places on truth is rightfully suspect. However, the second part of Rashi’s comment is more difficult to understand. Indeed, trust-worthiness will lead to compliance with a judge’s decisions. However, why should our selection of judges be guided by a concern over promoting compliance with a judge’s rulings? That task would seem to be better left to the police!

The third 

The first part of Rashi’s comment is easily understood – a judge must be trust-worthy. Trust-worthiness is a measure of a person’s dedication to being truthful. If a person says that he or she will do something and doesn’t do it, the value that that person places on truth is rightfully suspect. However, the second part of Rashi’s comment is more difficult to understand. Indeed, trust-worthiness will lead to compliance with a judge’s decisions. However, why should our selection of judges be guided by a concern over promoting compliance with a judge’s rulings? That task would seem to be better left to the police!

The third perek of Masechet Sanhedrin discusses the procedure for selecting a court when two litigants do not have access to courts of expert judges such as those that existed in the Land of Israel during the time of the Sanhedrin. The Mishna presents the procedure of zabla – an acronym for ze borer lo echad. According to the position of Rabbi Meir, each litigant chooses one judge to sit on a court and the two litigants then cooperate to select a third judge to sit in judgment with the first two. The gemara wonders why such a convoluted process is necessary – wouldn’t it be easier for the two parties to come to a consensus about which court to use to hear the case? The gemara explains that by constructing the court through the zabla procedure – each litigant first choosing a judge – truth will be achieved. Rashi explains the meaning of the gemara. Truth will be achieved because each litigant – even when found guilty – will be more likely to comply with the court’s ruling because he knows that the judge that he chose represented his claim as completely as possible. Since the judge that he chose was involved in the ruling, he will believe that the ruling is fair. The litigant will follow the court’s direction.

It appears from this gemara that the Torah is concerned not only with arriving at correct judgments but at creating a society that complies with justice. If judges make rulings and nobody listens, justice is hollow. If courts issue decisions and litigants complain, justice is eroded. A just society is the goal of the Torah’s judicial system – not simply just decisions.

Perhaps this idea explains Rashi’s understanding that trust-worthiness is a necessary quality in a judge. A judge’s trust-worthiness will lead to compliance with the litigant’s rulings. When judges are trust-worthy, people will listen. When society listens to the decisions of judges, society is more just, overall.

Perhaps this idea explains Rashi’s understanding that trust-worthiness is a necessary quality in a judge. A judge’s trust-worthiness will lead to compliance with the litigant’s rulings. When judges are trust-worthy, people will listen. When society listens to the decisions of judges, society is more just, overall.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vows Compromise Our Free Will - Parshat Vayetze 5776 - November 20, 2015

At the opening of this week’s parasha , Vayetze, Ya’akov is leaving eretz Yisrael to find refuge in Charan from his brother, Esav. He arrives at HaMakom – The Place – to sleep for the night – the place of Ya’akov’s famous ladder dream. Morning comes. Yaakov takes the stone that he slept on, makes a monument to Hashem with it and anoints it with oil. He renames the place Beit E-l – House of Hashem. The Torah then records that Ya’akov made a neder – a vow. “If the Lord will be with me and will guard me on this path that I am going and will give me bread to eat and clothes to wear and will return me in peace to the house of my father … then I will give one-tenth of all that I have to Hashem.” At first glance, the fact that Ya’akov made a vow seems inappropriate. In general, the Torah looks down on vows. Our chachamim say noder nikra cho’te – one who makes a vow is treated like a sinner. What is wrong with making a vow? Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch explains that at worst a vow elevates tr...

Project Exodus

Mrs. Shelley Kutliroff, Morah Anat Kampf and Rabbi Moshe Nachbar (not shown) are leading the Junior High School students in Project Exodus with additional guidance from Talya Tsuna and Dr. Whitney Kennon. Project Exodus is a project of and is being funded by a grant from The Jewish Community Partners. The Junior High Students at the Margolin Hebrew Academy will be studying the history of the Jews from the Former Soviet Union via interviews with many local Jewish immigrants from the FSU. Project Exodus is an attempt to permanently document and archive the experiences of Jewish immigrants to Memphis from the former Soviet Union. This project is the inspiration of Lynne Mirvis.

Responding to Disaster in Baton Rouge - Parashat Ki Tavo 5776 - September 23, 2016

This has been a unique week for the students of the Feinstone Yeshiva of the South! In a normal week, two presentations – one by Rabbi Dovid Lieberman on the topic of Free Will and another by Ambassador Yoram Ettinger on the topic of supporting the State of Israel – would have been momentous. But this was no ordinary week. Our students – Cooper Yeshiva on Sunday/Monday and Goldie Margolin on Wednesday/Thursday – partnered with Nechama-Jewish Response to Disaster in providing disaster relief to three families who suffered catastrophic loss during last month’s floods in Baton Rouge, LA. Our students hauled damaged personal effects to the curb. They removed damaged drywall, flooring, paneling and appliances. They removed many, many nails. Our students worked very hard. As a chaperone for each of these two trips (CYHSB and GMSG), I saw the students witnessing destruction first-hand. The scenes were sobering. We saw block after block of homes devoid of life – families gone and the guts of t...