Skip to main content

Monetary Compensation for an Eye - Parashat Emor 5778 - May 5, 2018


This week’s parasha, Emor, presents the well-known and oft-quoted dictum, ayin tachat ayin, an eye in place of an eye. Taken in isolation, the literal meaning of this phrase is clear – the punishment for poking out another’s eye is the loss of the perpetrator’s eye. We all know, however, that our mesorah teaches that the punishment for poking out another’s eye is monetary payment for the loss. The Rambam writes that in the history of the Jewish People there has never been an authorized Jewish court that has poked out a perpetrator’s eye for damaging another’s eye.

While this interpretation of 
ayin tachat ayin is uniformly accepted, our chachamim struggle with the question of why the Torah writes “an eye in place of an eye”, if, in fact, the Torah intends monetary payment. One suggestion offered in the gemara in Masechet Bava Kamma is that, when interpreted literally, an “eye for an eye” would lead to inequity in punishments – perpetrators with two healthy eyes will lose an eye but blind people will suffer no punishment. Based on the Torah principle that there is “one law for the Jewish People”, the only punishment that could be enforced equitably is monetary compensation to the victim.

Rav Mordechai Breuer offers a compelling explanation as to why 
ayin tachat ayin – an eye for an eye – is appropriately monetary compensation. Hashem reveals, through His Torah, a system of law and a guide for personal perfection. Let us consider the appropriate punishment for poking out someone’s eye from these two frameworks.
Imagine that Reuven pokes out Shimon’s eye. From a strictly legal perspective, Reuven is obligated to monetarily compensate Shimon for the loss of his eye. However, there is another perspective to consider – Reuven acted improperly when he poked out Shimon’s eye, even if it was only an accident. From this perspective of personal perfection, Reuven deserves a punishment which fits his crime – a punishment which will educate him about the severity and impact of his misdeed. From this perspective, Reuven should lose the use of his own eye. By losing his eye, he will truly understand his error.

Rav Breuer suggests that these two perspectives represent the tension between the words of the verse –
ayin tachat ayin – and the interpretation of our mesorah – monetary compensation in place of an eye. The Written Torah focuses on the most appropriate consequence from the perspective of the perpetrator – suffering the loss of an eye. However, the Oral Torah – the mesorah – teaches that monetary compensation in place of an eye is, in fact, the law – the victim must be made as whole as possible. Rav Breuer explains that the respective consequences taught by the Written and Oral Torah reflect two frameworks – punishment for the perpetrator and compensation for the victim.

Based on this analysis, Rav Breuer explains why monetary compensation is, in fact, the law. Poking out the perpetrator’s eye only accomplishes the goal of teaching him the consequence of his action. Monetary compensation, in comparison, meets the goals of
both punishment for the perpetrator and compensation for the victim. Money offers the victim, Shimon, the best compensation possible. Furthermore, money additionally serves the aim of punishing Reuven. While monetary compensation is not exact, it is superior to poking out the perpetrator’s eye because the victim is compensated to a degree and the perpetrator is punished to a degree. The Torah’s two aims of creating a legal system and supporting personal perfection are both accomplished. Hence, the halacha is compensation.
(This is an edited version of an article previously published in this newsletter)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Meaning of the Shofar - Parashat Netzavim 5776 - September 30, 2016

In allusion to George Orwell: all of the passages in the Rambam’s magnum opus – the Mishne Torah – are meaningful; but some are more meaningful than others. One such passage in The Laws of Repentance (3:4) fits this description. Maimonides writes: Even though the sounding of the shofar on Rosh HaShanah is a decree, it contains an allusion. It is as if [the call of the shofar ] is saying: Wake up you sleepy ones from your sleep and you who slumber, arise. Inspect your deeds, repent, remember your Creator. Those who forget the truth in the vanities of time and throughout the entire year, devote their energies to vanity and emptiness which will not benefit or save: Look to your souls. Improve your ways and your deeds and let every one of you abandon his evil path and thoughts. Accordingly, throughout the entire year, a person should always look at himself as equally balanced between merit and sin and the world as equally balanced between merit and sin. If he performs one sin, he tips his...

Honor and Glory - Parashat Termuah 5780, February 28, 2020

This week’s  parasha , Termuah, and next week’s parasha , Tetzave, introduce Hashem’s command regarding the plans for the  mishkan  and its vessels – including the clothing worn by the  kohanim . One of the vessels that Hashem commands to be built is the  menorah  – the candelabra. The description of the plans for the menorah are described in Parashat Terumah and the description of its service is described in Parashat Tetzave. In Parashat Tetzave, the Torah says, “and they will take for you pure olive oil pressed to be lit to raise an everlasting candle.” Each evening the  kohanim  were obligated to light the candelabra with enough oil to last the night. In the morning, the  kohanim  were obligated to fix and relight the  menorah , as necessary, thus ensuring that the candelabra would constantly be lit. The Rambam – Maimonides – explains, based on a later verse, that the  mitzvah  to light the candelabra in the mishk...

Teaching Empathy - Parashat Ki Tetze - September 1, 2017

This week’s parasha , Ki Tetze, presents a summary of many of the mitzvot . In the last section of the parasha , the Torah recounts two sets of commandments. The first set discusses the just treatment of the downtrodden. The Torah writes, “You shall not pervert the judgment of a convert or orphan and you shall not take the garment of a widow as a pledge. You will remember that you were a slave in Egypt and Hashem, your G-d, redeemed you from there; therefore, I command you to do this thing.” The second set discusses the obligations of a harvester to the downtrodden. The Torah writes, “When you reap your harvest in your field, and you forget a bundle in the field, you shall not turn back to take it; it will be for the convert, the orphan and the widow, so that Hashem, your G-d, will bless you in all that you do. When you beat the olive tree, do not remove all the splendor behind you; it will be for the convert, the orphan and the widow. When you harvest your vineyard, you will not...