Skip to main content

Yosef and Yehuda: Models of Moral Leadership - Parashat Vayigash - January 6, 2017

This week’s parasha, VaYigash, presents the story of the reunification of Ya’akov’s sons and the family’s move from the Land of Cana’an to Egypt. At the end of last week’s parasha, Yosef set up a ruse in which Binyamin was accused of stealing a royal goblet. Our parasha opens with Yehuda’s plea to Yosef on behalf of Binyamin in the moments before Yosef’s revelation of his true identity to his brothers.

In this moment, Yosef and Yehuda demonstrate that they have become the leaders of b’nei yisrael – Yosef through his position of power in Egyptian society and Yehuda through his commitment to responsibility for Binyamin’s safety and his follow through on that commitment.

This week’s haftarah – a passage from Sefer Yechezkel – relates a prophecy that describes a future time for b’nei yisrael. In this famous prophecy, Hashem commands Ezekiel to make a demonstration to the people involving two wooden tablets. On one tablet, Ezekiel is to inscribe, “For Yehuda and the Children of Israel, his compatriots”. On the other tablet, Ezekiel is to inscribe, “For Yosef, the wooden tablet of Ephraim, and all the Children of Israel, his compatriots”. Hashem commands Ezekiel to bring the two tablets together in his hands – and at that moment the two tablets will become one.

Hashem tells Ezekiel to explain to b’nei yisrael that this demonstration represents Hashem’s commitment to His people – He will unify a nation that has become spread out and steeped in moral pollution of the surrounding base societies. Rav Samson Rafael Hirsch explains that the prophecy is describing two camps within the nation of Israel – one identified with Yosef and one identified with Yehuda. Although one camp is identified with Yosef and one with Yehuda, each camp is not living in accordance with the ideals of its namesake – their connection to these patriarchs represents their respective shortcomings. According to Rav Hirsch, the prophecy records Hashem’s commitment to unify the nation by rehabilitating the values of each of these camps and reconnecting the people to their namesakes.

Rav Hirsch’s explanation of this prophecy begs the question - what respective philosophies or value systems do Yosef and Yehuda represent? Asked in another way, in what quality are the two camps described in Yechezkel’s vision deficient? In the prophecy, what is stopping the Yosef camp from joining with the Yehuda camp?

In a passage in Sefer Hoshea, the prophet speaks extensively about the shortcoming associated with the “camp of Yosef” described in this prophetic time – they place too much trust in other nations and place little trust in Hashem. This description of the “camp of Yosef” connects with what we know about the value system that Yosef HaTzadik exemplified – he is the committed Jew in exile. He remained moral even in the face of an opportunity for sin with the wife of Potiphar. He pronounced his belief and trust in Hashem in his conveying the interpretation of the dreams of Paroh. The quality that exemplifies the “camp of Yosef” is placing trust in Hashem even in exile – when G-d’s Providence is less apparent.

In a passage in his sefer, the prophet Isaiah speaks extensively about the shortcoming associated with the “camp of Yehuda” – punctilious observance of the mitzvot coupled with a complete lack of commitment to honesty and truth. He castigates the “camp of Yehuda” for the fact that their performance of mitzvot does not lead to a greater enlightenment or commitment to emet – truth – and chesed – loving-kindness. Our patriarch, Yehuda, is a paragon of the cultivating of truth and honesty through commitment to Hashem’s will. When Tamar confronted him with his sin, Yehuda instantly admitted the sin and took responsibility for her welfare. When pressed to return to Egypt to retrieve his brother, Shimon, Yehuda made an honest and reasoned commitment to his father to take Binyamin to Egypt and to return him home safely. The quality that exemplifies the “camp of Yehuda” is growth in understanding and allegiance to truth and honesty through the performance of mitzvot.

Returning to our question – what is preventing the reunification of the camps associated with Yosef and Yehuda in the time of Ezekiel? The answer is that the moral shortcomings of the people keep them from being a united people. The prophet presents an inspiring solution to this problem – Hashem will lead the people in moral development and this growth will create the opportunity for reunification. Indeed, this prophecy serves as a model for all situations of disharmony within the various camps of b’nei yisrael – personal and communal moral growth is a powerful agent for national harmony.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Today, Leading Tomorrow - Rabbi Owen's Operational Dinner Remarks - Monday, September 17, 2018

You may have noticed that we have two new huge street-side banners on White Station Road. One of them says, “Learning Today, Leading Tomorrow”. What do we mean by this? How does learning prepare for leading? The distinctiveness and difference of the Jewish People is a theme that appears regularly and intensely throughout the Yom Kippur prayers. On Yom Kippur afternoon, we read the section of the Torah dealing with immorality. The Torah says, “Do not act in the ways of the land of Egypt in which you lived; and do not act in the ways of the land of Cana’an to which I, Hashem, am taking you – and do not follow their customs. Follow My laws and guard My customs to walk in these ways – I am Hashem your G-d.” The Torah is teaching that Egypt and Cana’an represent spiritually harmful elements of each culture in which the Jewish People will find themselves over the centuries and instructs us to separate from the temptation to assimilate these ideas. The Jewish People dwell alone. Hashe...

Honor and Glory - Parashat Termuah 5780, February 28, 2020

This week’s  parasha , Termuah, and next week’s parasha , Tetzave, introduce Hashem’s command regarding the plans for the  mishkan  and its vessels – including the clothing worn by the  kohanim . One of the vessels that Hashem commands to be built is the  menorah  – the candelabra. The description of the plans for the menorah are described in Parashat Terumah and the description of its service is described in Parashat Tetzave. In Parashat Tetzave, the Torah says, “and they will take for you pure olive oil pressed to be lit to raise an everlasting candle.” Each evening the  kohanim  were obligated to light the candelabra with enough oil to last the night. In the morning, the  kohanim  were obligated to fix and relight the  menorah , as necessary, thus ensuring that the candelabra would constantly be lit. The Rambam – Maimonides – explains, based on a later verse, that the  mitzvah  to light the candelabra in the mishk...

Building Appropriate Fences - Parashat Ki Seitzei 5778, August 24, 2018

Among the many mitzvot described in this week’s parasha , Parashat Ki Tetze, is the law of the ma’ake – a fence. “When you build a new house, you shall make a guard rail for your roof, so that you shall not cause blood to be spilled in your house, that the one who falls should fall from it.” In this verse, the Torah commands us to build a fence around any exposed high area, such as a flat roof or deck, that is commonly used by human beings. Viewing this law as a positive commandment, the Rambam teaches that one must make a blessing when constructing a ma’ake . The law of the ma’ake is one of many Torah laws that teach us to protect human life. Positive commandments such as ve’nishmartem me’od et nafshotechem (and you shall greatly guard your physical life) and ve’rapo yerape (and you shall surely heal) reveal the Torah’s appreciation of man’s vulnerability and the lengths that we must go to foster human safety. Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik extends this concept of bui...